jinzihao.info Education USABILITY TESTING PDF

Usability testing pdf

Thursday, July 11, 2019 admin Comments(0)

Sep 30, PDF | The aim of this paper is to review some work conducted in the field of user testing that aims at specifying or clarifying the test procedures. stages of the design process. In the early stages, however, techniques such as walkthroughs are often more appropriate. Usability testing is not a substitute for a . Chapter 6. Usability Testing. User testing with real users is the most fundamental usability method and is in some sense irreplaceable, since it provides direct.


Author: CURTIS LAMBERT
Language: English, Spanish, Hindi
Country: New Zealand
Genre: Fiction & Literature
Pages: 435
Published (Last): 24.07.2016
ISBN: 662-7-65734-996-3
ePub File Size: 27.71 MB
PDF File Size: 9.54 MB
Distribution: Free* [*Regsitration Required]
Downloads: 34769
Uploaded by: KRYSTA

User Centered Design. Usability Testing Categories. Testing Basics: It's Easier Than You Think. Step 1: Plan and Prep. Step 2: Find Participants. This document details usability testing basics—how to apply them with any product In a typical usability test, real users try to accomplish typical goals, or tasks. Oct 22, PDF | 4+ hours read | Usability testing is an essential skill for usability practitioners -- professionals whose primary goal is to provide guidance.

Mosier This point will allow the individual to evaluate the application with curiosity without getting overwhelmed or bored. Usability - Smart app helps patients deal with pain. If you like my sketches, you can buy me a coffee to support my work! In contrast to those two studies, Lee , an education researcher, aimed to test commercially available oral health apps on young users with children ranging in age from three to six years old.

Woo suggested a PC-based smart oral examination system for dentists. In contrast to those two studies, Lee , an education researcher, aimed to test commercially available oral health apps on young users with children ranging in age from three to six years old.

This A Toothbrushes and User Interface of Rainbow testing also mainly focused on the learning benefits of the app: Therefore, most studies have not explored design guidelines or the user experience. As a result, we further restricted KR electronic charts and our search to accredited apps. Education categories.

The search: Dental office advertisement Sources: Main menu 2nd Level In addition, users must navigate back through the pages they were on before or go to the home page in order to choose another path.

Usability Testing In order to review the user experience of oral health education applications, we employed usability testing based on in-depth interviews of experts from the oral health and UX design domains.

Usability testing is a method in which users evaluate their experience when they use digital products or Source: As a result, we usability. According to Jakob Nielsen, found Toothflix: Like Dentify, this app pluralistic walkthroughs, feature inspections, or also employs a hierarchical navigation. This informal method requires a small years; and one male UX project manager and one number of usability evaluators to examine design female UX designer with an average of two and half elements based on established usability principles.

This heuristic evaluation invites [Table 4] Background Information of Interviewees experts from specific domains or the human Years of Gender Age Profession Affiliation computer interaction area and allows them to Experience 1 Male 34 4 University evaluate the system under given evaluation scales. Dentist dental 2 Female 28 1 For example, stock experts would evaluate a stock clinic UX project UX exchange system based on evaluation scales.

This 3 Male 39 4 manager agency method assumes an evaluator is also a user; UX in 4 Female 26 1. Then, in usability testing the usability problems, he recommends running three sessions, we asked them to complete the eight studies with five users in order to fix the usability tasks as shown in [Table 5].

Pdf usability testing

After they completed the subjects tasks, we then asked them to complete the Source: Nielsen Norman Group. This Honeycomb 4. Apps To conduct usability testing for the Dentify and Toothflix apps, we recruited six experts. The test group was composed of two dentists and four UX design experts: Semantic Studios.

Before developing our Valuable: Results [Table 7] shows how experts graded each checklist. Intention to reuse 2.

Testing pdf usability

We also between Dentify and Toothflix from each usability included an oral health content issue, since reliable principle. Garret defines five planes for building the elements of user experience design. Further details of these planes show that the information in visuals, current information NA scope plane indicates content requirements and mostly presented in functional specifications. Jesse James Garrett. As a result, It is hard to know which and this clear organization allows users to select text belongs to which image.

A 5 Oral Health Contents: To accommodate these 1 Scope Plane: In order to find a treatment 4. Issues Identified in Toothflix for sharp pain, a user goes through five levels Toothflix provides persuasive videos and visual under the "Problem" tab. Therefore, there are too images, such as: Toothflix that were identified from the in depth 3 Skeleton Plane: First, most information is in interviews.

This results in a user likely experiencing a cognitive health information in provided only via text form videos. Therefore, a burden recalling the same information from one user must guess the page to another.

First, the app rarely provides visuals. This distracts a user reading the together. Third, the image in the splash screen is health information menu, a user cannot blurry and pixelated. Third, the size of the body text find information about brushing. Further issues were found as shown below. Besides that, this app presents relatively button, a user is logged out immediately without an less usability problems than the Dentify app.

Yet alert. First, most information is videos, thus prohibiting users ability to navigate and provided in videos, therefore, a user has to play the receive information to a certain degree. Before playing a video, a user should guess the content of [Table 10] Summary of Usability Issues Identified in each video from thumbnail images.

Otherwise, a user Dentify and Toothflix has to play each video one-by-one. Most of all, these apps did not include a search option. This critical content requirement should be discussed 5. Conclusions early in the design process.

Testing pdf usability

First, we reviewed existing design. This aligns with some issues found in the smartphone applications in oral health education and structure, skeleton, and surface planes.

Usability Testing — Part 1

Third, we health education information Smith, A. Lastly, we Lee Currently, Dentify usability problems: Although Dentify offers well offers mostly text-heavy information and Toothflix categorized health information divided by a only provides videos for presenting information.

In detail, pages. Also, presenting consistent and most information is presented in text form. It also theme-appropriate visual impressions should be taken offers an unnecessary background tooth image into account.

The Guide to Usability Testing

To do so, designers should carefully throughout the pages and uses inconsistent body text plan and use consistent typography, colors, text, and size and margins.

Also, the app received a low score grids etc. Moreover, in some cases, a user practitioners can use our qualitative studies as guides goes through five levels to find needed information. However, this study is limited materials and allows users to understand health to specific applications and our checklists have not content easily.

Also, the use of graphic elements, been validated by a larger user group.

Pdf usability testing

Therefore, it such as colors, icons, and grids, is compatible for may not apply to all oral health applications. Studies text. This forces a user to click and play each video on UI requirements of hospital information system if they seek specific information.

First, both Morville, User experience design of a Additionally, if these apps provide alternative terms self-diagnostic medical device and service for for oral health symptoms, users would better benefit pregnant women. Archives of Design Research, 28 1 , Developing terms. Korea Digital Design Society, 13 3 , Internet Parent-infant health information, - Colgate.

Persuasive technology: Human Computer Interaction. Morgan Kaufmann Publisher. Pajoo city: Ahn Graphics. Log In Sign Up.

(PDF) Virtual Usability Testing | P. Haazebroek - jinzihao.info

Virtual Usability Testing. Virtual Usability Testing proceedings. These measures are primarily method of usability testing which combines the strengths of focused on between-page behavior and typically do not usability testing with the benefits of modern user behavior allow the analysis of user behavior from a usability point of logging techniques.

The few web usage logging tools e. Asynchronous, Web usage logging This renders the logged data often of limited usefulness. The logging techniques. This method involves logging web events, 2 defining tasks, 3 conducting the calling test users by phone, instruct and guide them test, 4 analyzing the data. Each of these components is remotely and logging their screen using video capture discussed below.

The obvious advantages include the flexibility of Logging web events allowing test users to participate that are not able to come Modern web browsers are equipped with JavaScript to the usability lab, not having to have a laboratory and engines that allow the running of scripts on the background.

However, these in [2] — by adding additional event handlers to the advantages are quite limited as remote usability testing still Document Object Model that allow to send simple requires the evaluator to sit in real time, one on one albeit messages to the log server while the user is interacting with remotely with a single test user and monitor the test.

By attaching these handlers to browser events of software does not always appeal to test users. That is, during usage of a website, user behavior is webpages. This technique only requires the addition of a measured and stored in a log file. After collecting the data, single line of JavaScript code to each webpage that is to be the log file is analyzed. A well-known example is Google tracked.

Test users do not need to install any type of Analytics. Figure 1 shows the conducting a classical usability test. Such tasks may click surface of a webpage, indicating which clicks were involve the most important flows of interaction on a successful and which were incorrect.

Figure 2 shows a website e. Next to the form fields percentage product ordering, payment , but may also include labels are added, indicating how often a field was the first occasional tasks that are still quite important e.

In addition to these tasks, a test also was the last one to be edited. This gives a rough idea of includes questionnaire items in order to acquire the test how users in general fill out the web form. Conducting the test When the test is defined, the study is made active and test Figure 1.